Home
Login
Sign Up
Home
Login
Sign Up

Infor Mid-Atlantic User Group

Since June, 2015

325 followers »
Feed
Home

Latest Media

Infor Mid Atlantic User Group Spring Virtual Meeting
April 8th, 2020
Infor Mid-Atlantic User Group
The 7 Most Expensive Words in Business (Embracing HR Innovation)
September 9th, 2020
Infor Mid-Atlantic User Group
See All »

Events

There are no events scheduled at this time, please check back.

Feedback?

Let us know what you think or how we can improve

Stephanie Snyder Infor Mid-Atlantic User Group
BC:
Please consider endorsing enhancement request 127084 -

Situation:

We want to be able to force an associate to attest to their time. We do not want the timeout to enable them a work around to keep from attesting to time. The employee would go to clock IN and have only a 'Yes or No' option to attest. If they do not choose it will not allow them to clock in their shift.
Delivered Read
9
Stephanie Snyder Infor Mid-Atlantic User Group
BC:
Please consider endorsing enhancement request 121302 -

Situation:

I have completed an activity. After I have completed it, I can go back and click on review view the activity again. With no changes to the activity details, where you can see that it has been completed. To be able to have a report/visibility to how many times someone has went back to review the activity after completion would allow for leaders/admin of Learning and Development to be see if there are  Read more...patterns that need to be reviewed with associates/employees.
Business Impact
Having this would allow for leaders/admin of L&D to be able to see how many times associates/resources are clicking review AFTER completing the training. It would allow for leaders/admin of Learning and Development to be able to see patterns that need to be reviewed with associates/employees. Show less...
Delivered Read
34
Chris Garges Infor Mid-Atlantic User Group
BC:
Please consider endorsing enhancement request 118997 -
The Match Aging report is currently including a few false positive reporting measures:
1. Service contract by amount invoices that are not truly matched because they have an open message are showing matched within so many days on this report and shouldn't. A Matched invoice is one that is ready to pay. Not one that has an open message to be resolved.
2. Match Date is a Date field (per infor) and not a timestamp thus  Read more...causing a discrepancy between the audit log when it matched vs the Match date on this field in the business class. And this also causes Negative match days in this report, which is not possible. And Matched invoices on the same day should be 0.
3. Create date between the audit log and the create date on the invoice do not align and this is also (suspecting the same issue as above in #2), again causing mis reporting for match aging since it is taking the create date vs match date to make the # of days calculation.
4. Matching Rate does not allow a drill back into the detail and that would be highly beneficial. Especially since this has different information than the Match Aging report. Show less...
Delivered Read
27
See All »

About Infor Mid-Atlantic User Group

The mission for the Infor Mid-Atlantic User Group is to bring together persons who use and support Infor Software applications within the states of Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia and to provide a platform to promote and exchange concepts and techniques concerning use of all Infor Software products.

Online