Home
Login
Sign Up
Home
Login
Sign Up
Northeast Infor User Group
Feed
Home
335 followers »

About

NELUG, the Northeast Infor User Group, is an organization supported by, but independent of Infor Software, dedicated to maximizing the benefits and experience of using Infor Software and related third party products.

More Details

Owners

Kelly Gingras
Kevin Hyland
Loring Kaveney
Ray Wagner

Tagged

Regulatory Enhancement Request
IPA
User Groups
Tue, June, 23rd 2026
Stephanie Snyder Northeast Infor User Group
BC:
Please consider endorsing enhancement request 127084 -

Situation:

We want to be able to force an associate to attest to their time. We do not want the timeout to enable them a work around to keep from attesting to time. The employee would go to clock IN and have only a 'Yes or No' option to attest. If they do not choose it will not allow them to clock in their shift.
Delivered Read
Mon, September, 22nd 2025
Stephanie Snyder Northeast Infor User Group
BC:
Please consider endorsing enhancement request 121302 -

Situation:

I have completed an activity. After I have completed it, I can go back and click on review view the activity again. With no changes to the activity details, where you can see that it has been completed. To be able to have a report/visibility to how many times someone has went back to review the activity after completion would allow for leaders/admin of Learning and Development to be see if there are  Read more...patterns that need to be reviewed with associates/employees.
Business Impact
Having this would allow for leaders/admin of L&D to be able to see how many times associates/resources are clicking review AFTER completing the training. It would allow for leaders/admin of Learning and Development to be able to see patterns that need to be reviewed with associates/employees. Show less...
Delivered Read
Wed, June, 11th 2025
Chris Garges Northeast Infor User Group
BC:
Please consider endorsing enhancement request 118997 -
The Match Aging report is currently including a few false positive reporting measures:
1. Service contract by amount invoices that are not truly matched because they have an open message are showing matched within so many days on this report and shouldn't. A Matched invoice is one that is ready to pay. Not one that has an open message to be resolved.
2. Match Date is a Date field (per infor) and not a timestamp thus  Read more...causing a discrepancy between the audit log when it matched vs the Match date on this field in the business class. And this also causes Negative match days in this report, which is not possible. And Matched invoices on the same day should be 0.
3. Create date between the audit log and the create date on the invoice do not align and this is also (suspecting the same issue as above in #2), again causing mis reporting for match aging since it is taking the create date vs match date to make the # of days calculation.
4. Matching Rate does not allow a drill back into the detail and that would be highly beneficial. Especially since this has different information than the Match Aging report. Show less...
Delivered Read
3
Mon, February, 10th 2025
Chris Garges Northeast Infor User Group
BC:
Please help us endorse ER 115831 to allow PayablesInvoice Audit data to be more than 100 records. We currently cannot write reports properly for match rates, invoice life cycle because the audit trail only lasts for the most recent 100 audit entries. We are also losing the financial data that we are required to keep for at least 7 years. We appreciate it if you can review and endorse! Thank you
Delivered Read
1

Online