Executive summary: The SouthEast Mega User Group is currently focused on driving critical system enhancements to resolve data integrity and compliance gaps. Recent discussions center on escalating specific enhancement requests (ERs) to address limita…
AI-generated group overview
Saved insight
7-day viewUpdated August 30
Followers
374
In brief
**Executive summary:** The SouthEast Mega User Group is currently focused on driving critical system enhancements to resolve data integrity and compliance gaps. Recent discussions center on escalating specific enhancement requests (ERs) to address limitations in audit trail retention, reporting accuracy, and mandatory workflow enforcement. For administrators, the primary takeaway is the opportunity to collectively influence the product roadmap by endorsing requests that mitigate compliance risks and improve operational visibility. Monitoring these specific ERs is essential for long-term system stability and regulatory adherence.
What stands out
**Activity:** Recent group activity is dominated by high-priority advocacy for several enhancement requests. Members are actively identifying functional gaps in time attestation, learning and development reporting, and financial audit capabilities.
**Engagement:** The dialogue focuses on technical requirements and business impacts, specifically:
* **Compliance & Auditing:** Advocacy for ER 115831 to expand PayablesInvoice Audit data beyond the 100-record limit to meet 7-year retention requirements.
* **Reporting Accuracy:** Addressing technical discrepancies in the Match Aging report (ER 118997) regarding date fields and false positive matching.
* **Workflow Enforcement:** Proposing mandatory time attestation during the clock-in process (ER 127084) to prevent bypasses.
* **L&D Visibility:** Requesting metrics to track post-completion activity reviews (ER 121302).
**What to watch:** Keep a close eye on the endorsement status of ER 115831 and ER 118997, as these directly impact financial compliance and data reliability within the SouthEast Mega User Group ecosystem.
We want to be able to force an associate to attest to their time. We do not want the timeout to enable them a work around to keep from attesting to time. The employee would go to clock IN and have only a 'Yes or No' option to attest. If they do not choose it will not allow them to clock in their shift.
I have completed an activity. After I have completed it, I can go back and click on review view the activity again. With no changes to the activity details, where you can see that it has been completed. To be able to have a report/visibility to how many times someone has went back to review the activity after completion would allow for leaders/admin of Learning and Development to be see if there are Read more...patterns that need to be reviewed with associates/employees. Business Impact Having this would allow for leaders/admin of L&D to be able to see how many times associates/resources are clicking review AFTER completing the training. It would allow for leaders/admin of Learning and Development to be able to see patterns that need to be reviewed with associates/employees. Show less...
Please consider endorsing enhancement request 118997 - The Match Aging report is currently including a few false positive reporting measures: 1. Service contract by amount invoices that are not truly matched because they have an open message are showing matched within so many days on this report and shouldn't. A Matched invoice is one that is ready to pay. Not one that has an open message to be resolved. 2. Match Date is a Date field (per infor) and not a timestamp thus Read more...causing a discrepancy between the audit log when it matched vs the Match date on this field in the business class. And this also causes Negative match days in this report, which is not possible. And Matched invoices on the same day should be 0. 3. Create date between the audit log and the create date on the invoice do not align and this is also (suspecting the same issue as above in #2), again causing mis reporting for match aging since it is taking the create date vs match date to make the # of days calculation. 4. Matching Rate does not allow a drill back into the detail and that would be highly beneficial. Especially since this has different information than the Match Aging report. Show less...
