Home
Login
Sign Up
Home
Login
Sign Up

Georgia Alabama User Group

Since June, 2015

314 followers »
Georgia Alabama User Group
Contact Us
Feed
Home

About

Update - this group is no longer active.
The mission for GALUG is to bring together persons who use and support Lawson Software applications within the states of Alabama and Georgia and to provide a platform to promote and exchange concepts and techniques concerning use of all Lawson Software produ Read more...cts.

More Details

Owners

Brian Allen
Loring Kaveney
Mike Trice

Tagged

GALUG
Regulatory Enhancement Request
IPA
User Groups
Mon, September, 22nd 2025
Stephanie Snyder Georgia Alabama User Group
BC:
Please consider endorsing enhancement request 121302 -

Situation:

I have completed an activity. After I have completed it, I can go back and click on review view the activity again. With no changes to the activity details, where you can see that it has been completed. To be able to have a report/visibility to how many times someone has went back to review the activity after completion would allow for leaders/admin of Learning and Development to be see if there are  Read more...patterns that need to be reviewed with associates/employees.
Business Impact
Having this would allow for leaders/admin of L&D to be able to see how many times associates/resources are clicking review AFTER completing the training. It would allow for leaders/admin of Learning and Development to be able to see patterns that need to be reviewed with associates/employees. Show less...
Delivered Read
55
Wed, June, 11th 2025
Chris Garges Georgia Alabama User Group
BC:
Please consider endorsing enhancement request 118997 -
The Match Aging report is currently including a few false positive reporting measures:
1. Service contract by amount invoices that are not truly matched because they have an open message are showing matched within so many days on this report and shouldn't. A Matched invoice is one that is ready to pay. Not one that has an open message to be resolved.
2. Match Date is a Date field (per infor) and not a timestamp thus  Read more...causing a discrepancy between the audit log when it matched vs the Match date on this field in the business class. And this also causes Negative match days in this report, which is not possible. And Matched invoices on the same day should be 0.
3. Create date between the audit log and the create date on the invoice do not align and this is also (suspecting the same issue as above in #2), again causing mis reporting for match aging since it is taking the create date vs match date to make the # of days calculation.
4. Matching Rate does not allow a drill back into the detail and that would be highly beneficial. Especially since this has different information than the Match Aging report. Show less...
Delivered Read
144
Fri, February, 21st 2025
SouthEast Trainings or User Groups in 2025?
Katie Curtis Georgia Alabama User Group
BC:

Question:

Article:

SouthEast Trainings or User Groups in 2025?

Categorized as:

Infor/Lawson 10
CloudSuite
FSM

I'm new to the group. Are there any other upcoming trainings or user group meetings during 2025? I only see the Infor Midwest User Group training. Is there ever a virtual option for these?
Delivered Read
Categorized as:
Infor/Lawson 10
CloudSuite
FSM
1
2348
Mon, February, 10th 2025
Chris Garges Georgia Alabama User Group
BC:
Please help us endorse ER 115831 to allow PayablesInvoice Audit data to be more than 100 records. We currently cannot write reports properly for match rates, invoice life cycle because the audit trail only lasts for the most recent 100 audit entries. We are also losing the financial data that we are required to keep for at least 7 years. We appreciate it if you can review and endorse! Thank you
Delivered Read
193

Online