InforUsers Announcements

Since July, 2015 Platinum Partner

1234 followers »
InforUsers Announcements
URL:http://lgug.workoutloud.com/Group/inforusers-announcements

About

Announcements from Digital Concourse - This is an Auto Followed group to ensure that important Digital Concourse communications can be delivered effectively.

More Details

Owners

Eric Lopez
Loring Kaveney

Followers1279

(Holden) DeVille Lori Ann
Ackerman Kelli
Adams Mark
Adams Renee
Adkins Susan
agent agenter
Akonom Philip
Albright Kari
Aleszczyk John

Tagged

workoutloud
IPA
Regulatory Enhancement Request
Just For Fun
Financial Management
Human Capital Management
Community
Digital Concourse
Announcements
User Groups
Yesterday

[Uploaded File]

Loring has uploaded files to: InforUsers Announcements

See these files and others at: https://lgug.workoutloud.com/Group/inforusers-announcements/Files
1_c2886a41-c533-4fc6-9dbe-10e20c119d9d.docx
[Uploaded File] Loring has uploaded files to: InforUsers Announcements See these files and others at: https://lgug.workoutloud.com/Group/inforusers-announcements/Files
Delivered Read
SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: Please take a moment to review/endorse our Vertex Enhancement Requests. This is your opportunity to influence the product.

CALL TO ENDORSE Vertex Enhancement Requests

ER 78962 – Having Vertex Add Tax When The Invoice Does Have Tax (TX)

ER URL - https://ers.infor.com/ERS/Ers_Details.aspx?&erID=78962&AER=False&tbv=1

 Read more...Description
When vendor doesn’t charge tax at all (0 tax on invoice) we want to book what Vertex calculated to a tax accrual account and don’t compare tax as part of the invoice tolerance process.

Work Around
We must manually intervene with these invoices.

Proposed Solution
Currently, the system doesn’t differentiate invoice with 0 tax amount. It sent through tax tolerance and will be placed in unreleased unapproved status. We would like these invoices to be approved/released automatically without going through tax tolerance process so invoices will be paid as it is. Vertex calculated amount to be booked to use tax accrual account-subaccount combination (247-0000).
------------------------
ER 78495 – Revise Landed Tax Tolerance to Follow The Same Accounting As The Line Item (AP)

ER URL - https://ers.infor.com/ERS/Ers_Details.aspx?&erID=78495&AER=False&tbv=1

Description
We’re looking to book any differences that fall within the $50 tax tolerance following the same accounting as the item line (booked to an expense account). Currently, our tax tolerance setup is at $50, with tax code VAR and a default tax rounding account as shown below. The tax code has been defined with Land Cost Flag set to Yes, so that tax on an item is included in item’s cost.

Work Around
N/A

Proposed Solution
We’re looking to book any differences that fall within the $50 tax tolerance following the same accounting as the item line (booked to an expense account). Currently, our tax tolerance setup is at $50, with tax code VAR and a default tax rounding account as shown below. The tax code has been defined with Land Cost Flag set to Yes, so that tax on an item is included in item’s cost. In the example shown below (INV116343), we would want the Distribution for Tax Code VAR to follow item distribution company, accounting unit, account and sub account (1-72200-601-5).
-------------------------------
ER 78324 – Send Tax Usage Code To Vertex As Usage (AP)

ER URL - https://ers.infor.com/ERS/Ers_Details.aspx?&erID=78324&AER=False&tbv=1

Description
On PO20 Add and Release and on PO30 Release, we would like the Purchase Order Request sent to Vertex to include the Tax Usage Code field and pass to Vertex as Usage. Also, on Invoice Entry through MA54, which triggers a call to Vertex, or any other Invoice processing (i.e. AP20) that triggers a tax call to Vertex, we would like the Invoice Verification Request sent to Vertex to include the Tax Usage Code field and pass to Vertex as Usage.

Work Around
There is none.

Proposed Solution
Map the Tax Usage field to the Vertex SOAP Web call
Tax Usage Code Mapping Details
On PO20 Add and Release and on PO30 Release, we would like the Purchase Order Request sent to Vertex to include the Tax Usage Code field and pass to Vertex as Usage. Below is the mapping, and screenshot of Lawson field from where we expect this information to come from.

 Show less...
SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: Please take a moment to review/endorse our Vertex Enhancement Requests. This is your opportunity to influence the product. CALL TO ENDORSE Vertex Enhancement Requests ER 78962 – Having Vertex Add Tax When The Invoice Does Have Tax (TX) ER URL - https://ers.infor.com/ERS/Ers_Details.aspx?&erID=78962&AER=False&tbv=1 Description When vendor doesn’t charge tax at all (0 tax on invoice) we want to book what Vertex calculated to a tax accrual account and don’t compare tax as part of the invoice tolerance process. Work Around We must manually intervene with these invoices. Proposed Solution Currently, the system doesn’t differentiate invoice with 0 tax amount. It sent through tax tolerance and will be placed in unreleased unapproved status. We would like these invoices to be approved/released automatically without going through tax tolerance process so invoices will be paid as it is. Vertex calculated amount to be booked to use tax accrual account-subaccount combination (247-0000). ------------------------ ER 78495 – Revise Landed Tax Tolerance to Follow The Same Accounting As The Line Item (AP) ER URL - https://ers.infor.com/ERS/Ers_Details.aspx?&erID=78495&AER=False&tbv=1 Description We’re looking to book any differences that fall within the $50 tax tolerance following the same accounting as the item line (booked to an expense account). Currently, our tax tolerance setup is at $50, with tax code VAR and a default tax rounding account as shown below. The tax code has been defined with Land Cost Flag set to Yes, so that tax on an item is included in item’s cost. Work Around N/A Proposed Solution We’re looking to book any differences that fall within the $50 tax tolerance following the same accounting as the item line (booked to an expense account). Currently, our tax tolerance setup is at $50, with tax code VAR and a default tax rounding account as shown below. The tax code has been defined with Land Cost Flag set to Yes, so that tax on an item is included in item’s cost. In the example shown below (INV116343), we would want the Distribution for Tax Code VAR to follow item distribution company, accounting unit, account and sub account (1-72200-601-5). ------------------------------- ER 78324 – Send Tax Usage Code To Vertex As Usage (AP) ER URL - https://ers.infor.com/ERS/Ers_Details.aspx?&erID=78324&AER=False&tbv=1 Description On PO20 Add and Release and on PO30 Release, we would like the Purchase Order Request sent to Vertex to include the Tax Usage Code field and pass to Vertex as Usage. Also, on Invoice Entry through MA54, which triggers a call to Vertex, or any other Invoice processing (i.e. AP20) that triggers a tax call to Vertex, we would like the Invoice Verification Request sent to Vertex to include the Tax Usage Code field and pass to Vertex as Usage. Work Around There is none. Proposed Solution Map the Tax Usage field to the Vertex SOAP Web call Tax Usage Code Mapping Details On PO20 Add and Release and on PO30 Release, we would like the Purchase Order Request sent to Vertex to include the Tax Usage Code field and pass to Vertex as Usage. Below is the mapping, and screenshot of Lawson field from where we expect this information to come from.
Delivered Read
Wed, November, 10th 2021

A new blog article: Digitally Connect Before, During and After Inforum 2022 - was posted into: *InforUsers Newsletter
Delivered Read
Wed, November, 3rd 2021

2

Forum Question/Topic:

Article:

Infor OS CE Upgrade for V10 Single Tenant - any issues to look out for?

Categorized as:

Has anyone upgraded to the Infor OS CE in the single-tenant cloud yet? If so, any issues to be aware of?
Infor OS CE
Infor/Lawson 10
Has anyone upgraded to the Infor OS CE in the single-tenant cloud yet? If so, any issues to be aware of?
Delivered Read
2
Eric Lopez, Sampath Gowda like this.
I don't believe you will have many issues in single-tenant as my prior team has done this on an on-premise installation. The biggest challenge was the change management for the end users. Depending on how you are using GHR, there may be differences in the screens that users should be made aware of.
I don't believe you will have many issues in single-tenant as my prior team has done this on an on-premise installation. The biggest challenge was the change management for the end users. Depending on how you are using GHR, there may be differences in the screens that users should be made aware of.
If your users were used to using Ming.le/Portal, you should be fine. We went from Smart Office to Ming.le 12 and UX10 - it was a big change for our payroll and finance users.
If your users were used to using Ming.le/Portal, you should be fine. We went from Smart Office to Ming.le 12 and UX10 - it was a big change for our payroll and finance users.
Tue, September, 28th 2021

PLEASE VOTE: ER 77074 – RQC Needs to Be Updated to Allow for More Distribution Lines in A Distribution Code | Please Vote! - Currently, RQC only allows 15 distribution lines per distribution code. Our preference would be for RQC be modified like RQ10 and PO20. We currently have distribution codes that have over 650 distribution lines. It would be ideal if that limit could be expanded to 999 distribution lines. LINK to ER 77074

 Read more... https://ers.infor.com/ERS/SoHoXi/XiLogin.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fERS%2fErs_Details.aspx%3f%26erID%3d77074%26AER%3dFalse%26tbv%3d1&&erID=77074&AER=False&tbv=1 Show less...
PLEASE VOTE: ER 77074 – RQC Needs to Be Updated to Allow for More Distribution Lines in A Distribution Code | Please Vote! - Currently, RQC only allows 15 distribution lines per distribution code. Our preference would be for RQC be modified like RQ10 and PO20. We currently have distribution codes that have over 650 distribution lines. It would be ideal if that limit could be expanded to 999 distribution lines. LINK to ER 77074 https://ers.infor.com/ERS/SoHoXi/XiLogin.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fERS%2fErs_Details.aspx%3f%26erID%3d77074%26AER%3dFalse%26tbv%3d1&&erID=77074&AER=False&tbv=1
Delivered Read
1
Eric Lopez likes this.
Fri, May, 28th 2021

A new blog article: MEMORIAL DAY - Honor, Remember and Celebrate! - was posted into: *InforUsers Newsletter
Delivered Read
Tue, May, 11th 2021

A new blog article: 2021 National Hospital Week May 9-5, Thank you to hospitals and health care workers! - was posted into: *InforUsers Newsletter
Delivered Read
Fri, April, 9th 2021

A new blog article: Registration is Now Open: Join the East Coast Infor User Groups Spring Event - was posted into: East Coast Infor User Groups
Delivered Read
Wed, March, 17th 2021

A new blog article: Happy St. Patrick's Day - was posted into: *InforUsers Newsletter
A new blog article: Happy St. Patrick's Day - was posted into: *InforUsers Newsletter
Delivered Read
Fri, March, 5th 2021

Interest in Birst? Be the first to follow our new Birst community. Available for all interested parties to share and learn more about this exciting platform from Birst.

Also, if you are interested in playing a larger management role in this community, please contact @loringkaveney (loring.kaveney@workoutloud.com) to learn more!

To Follow: Read more... https://lgug.workoutloud.com/Group/birst

https://lgug.workoutloud.com/Group/birst Show less...
Interest in Birst? Be the first to follow our new Birst community. Available for all interested parties to share and learn more about this exciting platform from Birst. Also, if you are interested in playing a larger management role in this community, please contact @loringkaveney (loring.kaveney@workoutloud.com) to learn more! To Follow: https://lgug.workoutloud.com/Group/birst https://lgug.workoutloud.com/Group/birst
Delivered Read
Eric Lopez likes this.
Fri, February, 5th 2021

BC:
#HCM #Payroll
Delivered Read
The following message was shared by @ericlopez (Eric Lopez)
10 Months ago
BC:

Forum Question/Topic:

Article:

PR195 Accounting Unit Distribution of Fringe Benefits

Upgrading from v9 to v10, the accounting unit distribution is not behaving in the same methodology

Go to Full Message »

Wed, February, 3rd 2021

A new blog article: Congratulations to Bails - was posted into: *InforUsers Newsletter
Delivered Read
A new blog article: Congratulations to Bails - was posted into: *InforUsers Newsletter
Delivered Read
Tue, January, 12th 2021

The Seminole Tribe of Florida - New job opportunity! https://lgug.workoutloud.com/Message/943883
Delivered Read
Mon, December, 21st 2020

A new blog article: Cheers! - was posted into: *InforUsers Newsletter
A new blog article: Cheers! - was posted into: *InforUsers Newsletter
Delivered Read

Online