Home
Login
Sign Up
Profile Options
Tools
Edit Profile
Manage all aspects of your profile here including demographics, emails, notification settings, etc...
Change Password
Begin the password change process
Email Subscriptions
Manage your opt-in/opt-out email subscriptions
View Profile
View your profile - what other's see
Sign-out
Sign out of this community
1-800-819-1190
Contact support line
Smart Connect
Connect with others and manage various member options
View QR Code
View your profile QR Code - Connect and or share your contact information
Tour Page
Take an interactive tour of this page
Knowledge Base
Visit the knowledge base for more info
Insights
Member reporting and analysis
Terms of Use
Cookies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us
Help

SouthEast Mega User Group

Since November, 2015

370 followers »
SouthEast Mega User Group
Surveys3
SouthEast Mega User Group
Home
Contact Us Surveys3

About

SouthEast Mega Meeting

More Details

Owners

Amy Riechers
Cindy Minter
Highfill Beth
Janet Murdoch
John Desmarais
Loring Kaveney

Followers370

Adame Santana
ADDANKI RAMESH
Akins Margaret
Allen Brian
Anderson Mike
Araoz Charity
Armada Gina
Astvazaturov Anna
Baker Charlene
See All 370 Followers »

Tagged

SELUG
Regulatory Enhancement Request
erp
Talent Management
Global HR
S3
Infor
CloudSuite
CSF
HCM
Lawson
User Groups
IPA
Wed, June, 11th 2025
Chris Garges SouthEast Mega User Group
BC:
Please consider endorsing enhancement request 118997 -
The Match Aging report is currently including a few false positive reporting measures:
1. Service contract by amount invoices that are not truly matched because they have an open message are showing matched within so many days on this report and shouldn't. A Matched invoice is one that is ready to pay. Not one that has an open message to be resolved.
2. Match Date is a Date field (per infor) and not a timestamp thus  Read more...causing a discrepancy between the audit log when it matched vs the Match date on this field in the business class. And this also causes Negative match days in this report, which is not possible. And Matched invoices on the same day should be 0.
3. Create date between the audit log and the create date on the invoice do not align and this is also (suspecting the same issue as above in #2), again causing mis reporting for match aging since it is taking the create date vs match date to make the # of days calculation.
4. Matching Rate does not allow a drill back into the detail and that would be highly beneficial. Especially since this has different information than the Match Aging report. Show less...
Delivered Read
Uncategorized
Mon, February, 10th 2025
Chris Garges SouthEast Mega User Group
BC:
Please help us endorse ER 115831 to allow PayablesInvoice Audit data to be more than 100 records. We currently cannot write reports properly for match rates, invoice life cycle because the audit trail only lasts for the most recent 100 audit entries. We are also losing the financial data that we are required to keep for at least 7 years. We appreciate it if you can review and endorse! Thank you
Delivered Read
Uncategorized

Online